Public media is in the crosshairs. How will Alaska’s congressional delegation vote? – Alaska Beacon
Republican U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan, standing with Alaska Public Media President Ed Ulman, at left, accepted a “champion of public broadcasting” award in 2020 from a coalition of public television stations. Amid efforts to strip federal funding of public media, Sullivan calls NPR “overly partisan” but says he “understands that Alaska’s public radio stations are essential to our state.” (Photo courtesy of America’s Public Television Stations)
Should public media be spared the budget cutting axe of President Donald Trump and the congressional allies of the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE?
I’m not going to directly answer that question myself, because I’m not an unbiased observer: I’ve worked for years as a reporter and contractor for Alaska Public Media, Anchorage’s public radio and television station. I also have close friendships and working relationships with many of the reporters across the state whose jobs could be at stake.
I do, however, feel confident in saying that there’s another, related question that’s objectively interesting and less problematic for me to try to answer, which is: Will Alaska’s elected officials vote to buck Trump and preserve public media’s federal funding?
That question has become increasingly urgent with the Trump administration plan to end the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, or CPB.”
That nonprofit organization, in turn, grants money to both NPR and PBS, as well as to stations across the country — including more than 20 in Alaska, from Utqiagvik on the North Slope to Ketchikan near the Canadian boarder.
Alaska’s stations received more than $12 million from CPB last year, which can amount to 40% or more of their annual budgets.
NPR, which Trump and his allies have attacked as biased towards liberals, derives roughly 1% of its budget from CPB, though it also collects money from individual stations that run its programs.
Alaska’s public media leaders told me they believe Trump’s proposal is more likely to pass the Republican-controlled U.S. House.
They’re counting on the U.S. Senate — where only a few GOP votes would be needed to sink the plan — to be their firewall.
They describe Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski as a rock solid ally in preserving the funding. And they expect Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan, a longtime supporter of public media, to come to their defense, too.
But they also say they won’t know for certain until the votes are cast.
“I don’t want to say that I’m fully confident of their votes,” said Tom Abbott, general manager of KFSK in the Southeast Alaska fishing town of Petersburg, which gets some 30% of its budget from CPB.
But, Abbott added: “We’ve had very strong support from both of our U.S. senators, for several years now.”
I was curious to know where Sullivan, Murkowski and Alaska’s sole member of the U.S. House, Republican Nick Begich III, stood on what’s reported to be an impending proposal from Trump to rescind $1.1 billion, or two years of funding, for CPB.
I asked each of their offices Wednesday.
Begich’s spokesperson didn’t respond by my deadline. Murkowski’s spokesman, Joe Plesha, was unequivocal, saying that she is a “fierce advocate for Alaska’s public broadcasting and vehemently opposes this reported rescission.”
“While the administration might be targeting NPR and PBS by rescinding this funding, the real casualty will be local public broadcasting, which is vital for Alaska,” Plesha said.
Sullivan’s spokesperson, Amanda Coyne, also sent a statement: “While Sen. Sullivan believes that NPR has become overly partisan and has veered far from its mission to include a diversity of voices in its coverage, he understands that Alaska’s public radio stations are essential to our state, especially in rural areas.”
Sullivan has also, in recent days, responded to constituents who have emailed in support of public media funding, saying in a form letter that he “will continue to work with the current administration to stress the importance of public broadcasting in Alaska and nationwide.”
Sullivan’s position is particularly interesting because of his politics: Unlike Murkowski, he’s rarely publicly criticized Trump’s policies.
But while Trump’s White House has ripped into public media — saying this monththat “the NPR, PBS grift has ripped us off for too long” — Sullivan has long recognized its value, at least as far as the services it provides in rural communities.
In 2020, he accepted a “champion of public broadcasting” award from a coalition of public television stations. He also joined with Murkowski in recommending an Alaskan, Diane Kaplan, for a seat on CPB’s board of directors, and former President Joe Biden appointed her in 2022.
Kaplan is now in the news this week for a lawsuit she and CPB filed against Trump, alleging that the president is illegally attempting to fire her and other board members.
Begich’s vote will be interesting to watch, as well.
The representative, who’s just a few months into his first term, has aligned himself closely with Trump.
But he’s also sent constituents correspondence about public media funding that references the challenge of communication and information sharing in Alaska’s rural communities, saying that public media plays a “crucial role” in residents’ access to news and emergency alerts.
“I support fiscal responsibility and efforts to reduce wasteful government spending,” he said in one recent message. “I also recognize that certain investments provide valuable returns to our communities. I will continue to advocate for policies that enhance infrastructure, improve broadband access, and support communication networks that serve all Alaskans, including those in our rural communities.”
Republicans have targeted federal funding of public media for years. But those efforts have never gained as much traction as they’re getting now.
Abbott, in Petersburg, describes the current threat to federal funding as “by far, the most serious” in his 28 years as general manager. With the proposal from Trump expected, though still not yet introduced, “it puts us all in an uneasy position.”“We’re kind of waiting for the ax to drop,” he said.
Nathaniel Herz welcomes tips at [email protected] or (907) 793-0312. This article was originally published in Northern Journal, a newsletter from Herz. Subscribe at this link.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.
by Nathaniel Herz, Northern Journal, Alaska Beacon
May 3, 2025
by Nathaniel Herz, Northern Journal, Alaska Beacon
May 3, 2025
Should public media be spared the budget cutting axe of President Donald Trump and the congressional allies of the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE?
I’m not going to directly answer that question myself, because I’m not an unbiased observer: I’ve worked for years as a reporter and contractor for Alaska Public Media, Anchorage’s public radio and television station. I also have close friendships and working relationships with many of the reporters across the state whose jobs could be at stake.
I do, however, feel confident in saying that there’s another, related question that’s objectively interesting and less problematic for me to try to answer, which is: Will Alaska’s elected officials vote to buck Trump and preserve public media’s federal funding?
That question has become increasingly urgent with the Trump administration plan to end the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, or CPB.”
That nonprofit organization, in turn, grants money to both NPR and PBS, as well as to stations across the country — including more than 20 in Alaska, from Utqiagvik on the North Slope to Ketchikan near the Canadian boarder.
Alaska’s stations received more than $12 million from CPB last year, which can amount to 40% or more of their annual budgets.
NPR, which Trump and his allies have attacked as biased towards liberals, derives roughly 1% of its budget from CPB, though it also collects money from individual stations that run its programs.
Alaska’s public media leaders told me they believe Trump’s proposal is more likely to pass the Republican-controlled U.S. House.
They’re counting on the U.S. Senate — where only a few GOP votes would be needed to sink the plan — to be their firewall.
They describe Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski as a rock solid ally in preserving the funding. And they expect Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan, a longtime supporter of public media, to come to their defense, too.
But they also say they won’t know for certain until the votes are cast.
“I don’t want to say that I’m fully confident of their votes,” said Tom Abbott, general manager of KFSK in the Southeast Alaska fishing town of Petersburg, which gets some 30% of its budget from CPB.
But, Abbott added: “We’ve had very strong support from both of our U.S. senators, for several years now.”
I was curious to know where Sullivan, Murkowski and Alaska’s sole member of the U.S. House, Republican Nick Begich III, stood on what’s reported to be an impending proposal from Trump to rescind $1.1 billion, or two years of funding, for CPB.
I asked each of their offices Wednesday.
Begich’s spokesperson didn’t respond by my deadline. Murkowski’s spokesman, Joe Plesha, was unequivocal, saying that she is a “fierce advocate for Alaska’s public broadcasting and vehemently opposes this reported rescission.”
“While the administration might be targeting NPR and PBS by rescinding this funding, the real casualty will be local public broadcasting, which is vital for Alaska,” Plesha said.
Sullivan’s spokesperson, Amanda Coyne, also sent a statement: “While Sen. Sullivan believes that NPR has become overly partisan and has veered far from its mission to include a diversity of voices in its coverage, he understands that Alaska’s public radio stations are essential to our state, especially in rural areas.”
Sullivan has also, in recent days, responded to constituents who have emailed in support of public media funding, saying in a form letter that he “will continue to work with the current administration to stress the importance of public broadcasting in Alaska and nationwide.”
Sullivan’s position is particularly interesting because of his politics: Unlike Murkowski, he’s rarely publicly criticized Trump’s policies.
But while Trump’s White House has ripped into public media — saying this monththat “the NPR, PBS grift has ripped us off for too long” — Sullivan has long recognized its value, at least as far as the services it provides in rural communities.
In 2020, he accepted a “champion of public broadcasting” award from a coalition of public television stations. He also joined with Murkowski in recommending an Alaskan, Diane Kaplan, for a seat on CPB’s board of directors, and former President Joe Biden appointed her in 2022.
Kaplan is now in the news this week for a lawsuit she and CPB filed against Trump, alleging that the president is illegally attempting to fire her and other board members.
Begich’s vote will be interesting to watch, as well.
The representative, who’s just a few months into his first term, has aligned himself closely with Trump.
But he’s also sent constituents correspondence about public media funding that references the challenge of communication and information sharing in Alaska’s rural communities, saying that public media plays a “crucial role” in residents’ access to news and emergency alerts.
“I support fiscal responsibility and efforts to reduce wasteful government spending,” he said in one recent message. “I also recognize that certain investments provide valuable returns to our communities. I will continue to advocate for policies that enhance infrastructure, improve broadband access, and support communication networks that serve all Alaskans, including those in our rural communities.”
Republicans have targeted federal funding of public media for years. But those efforts have never gained as much traction as they’re getting now.
Abbott, in Petersburg, describes the current threat to federal funding as “by far, the most serious” in his 28 years as general manager. With the proposal from Trump expected, though still not yet introduced, “it puts us all in an uneasy position.”“We’re kind of waiting for the ax to drop,” he said.
Nathaniel Herz welcomes tips at natherz@gmail.com or (907) 793-0312. This article was originally published in Northern Journal, a newsletter from Herz. Subscribe at this link.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.
Alaska Beacon is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Alaska Beacon maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Andrew Kitchenman for questions: info@alaskabeacon.com.
Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our website. AP and Getty images may not be republished. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of any other photos and graphics.
Nathaniel Herz is a freelance reporter who’s spent a decade as a journalist in Alaska, including stints at the Anchorage Daily News and Alaska Public Media. His articles published in the Alaska Beacon first appeared in his newsletter, Northern Journal, at https://www.northernjournal.com.
DEMOCRACY TOOLKIT
© Alaska Beacon, 2025
v1.81.0
The Alaska Beacon is an independent, nonpartisan news organization focused on connecting Alaskans to their state government. Our journalists fairly and fearlessly report on the people and interests that determine state policy.
We’re part of States Newsroom, the nation’s largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.
Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our website. (See full republishing guidelines.)
© Alaska Beacon, 2025
Leave a Reply